
Why Are Pockets Still Missing in Women’s Clothing?
Share
Have you noticed how pockets are marketed to women as if they’re some revolutionary feature? I recently bought a pencil skirt, and the brand couldn’t stop talking about its “innovative” design—because it had pockets. But let’s face it, pockets in women’s clothing should be standard, not groundbreaking.
Over a century ago, tailors on Savile Row designed suits with multiple pockets for men, creating a functional wardrobe staple. Yet, women’s clothing still often comes with small or nonexistent pockets. This lack of functionality feels like a frustrating oversight, especially considering that pockets are essential for carrying items like money, keys, and phones.
Historically, women fought for the right to wear trousers, yet pockets didn’t follow. It’s a telling metaphor: while women have achieved formal equality in many areas (the trousers!), economic equality (the pockets!) is still a work in progress. After all, pockets aren’t just about convenience—they symbolize self-sufficiency and the ability to carry our own essentials.
Practical Solutions for the Lack of Pockets in Women’s Clothing
If you’re constantly frustrated by pocketless outfits, here are a few creative solutions to carry what you need:
- Wear a Belt Bag: Belt bags have made a comeback and are ideal for keeping essentials close without a bulky purse.
- Try Clip-On Pockets: Attach a small pouch to your waistband to add storage space instantly.
- Use a Phone Case Wallet: Combine your phone and wallet to keep everything essential in one place.
- Layer with a Jacket or Coat: Choose outerwear with functional pockets, perfect for adding extra storage while looking stylish.
- Opt for a Crossbody Bag: Compact and convenient, crossbody bags are a hands-free option for essentials.
Until pocket equality becomes the standard in fashion, these smart solutions will help you stay stylish and prepared!